Report a problem
Week 7 · Half PPR start/sit
Start Brevyn Spann-Ford or Seth McGowan?
Close call
Start Seth McGowan
Wins 51% of simulated matchups against Spann-Ford.
McGowan already played: 5.3 Half PPR pts (projected 1.4).
Week 6: Spann-Ford outscored McGowan 5.5 to 2.7. Our call, start McGowan (65%), was wrong.
Spann-Ford 49% 51% McGowan
Share of simulations in which each player scores more Half PPR pts. How accurate are these?
Free tiebreaker
McGowan has the higher ceiling
By how much, and who’s safer?
Need a big week? Start the higher ceiling. Favored? Start the safer floor. Pro shows both, side by side.
Unlock for today’s games
Free for a day · no card needed
Median (Half PPR) 1.4
Status Active
Median (Half PPR) 1.4
Status Active
Last 4 games
Recent form
- Spann-Ford: 2.0 Half PPR pts/game over his last 4, 39% of snaps, 1.3 touches, PHI allows the 22nd most to TEs.
- McGowan: 3.7 Half PPR pts/game over his last 4, 28% of snaps, 7.3 touches, MIN allows the 32nd most to RBs.
| Spann-Ford | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 6 | @ GB | 5.5 | 46% | 4 |
| Wk 5 | vs TB | 0.0 | 33% | – |
| Wk 4 | @ HOU | 0.0 | 40% | – |
| Wk 3 | vs BAL | 2.4 | 38% | 1 |
| McGowan | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | @ MIN | 5.3 | 33% | 12 |
| Wk 6 | vs TEN | 2.7 | 23% | 4 |
| Wk 5 | @ PIT | 2.4 | 27% | 6 |
| Wk 4 | @ WAS | 4.3 | 29% | 7 |
Week 7
Projected stat lines
| Stat | Spann-Ford | McGowan |
|---|---|---|
| Median Half PPR pts | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Rec | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| Rec Yds | 11.0 | 4.1 |
| Rec TD | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Rush Yds | 0.0 | 11.6 |
| Rush TD | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Floor, ceiling, boom & bust