Report a problem
Week 7 · Standard start/sit
Start Brevyn Spann-Ford or Seth McGowan?
Close call
Start Seth McGowan
Wins 54% of simulated matchups against Spann-Ford.
McGowan already played: 4.8 Standard pts (projected 1.1).
Week 6: Spann-Ford outscored McGowan 3.5 to 2.7. Our call, start McGowan (67%), was wrong.
Spann-Ford 46% 54% McGowan
Share of simulations in which each player scores more Standard pts. How accurate are these?
Free tiebreaker
McGowan has the higher ceiling
By how much, and who’s safer?
Need a big week? Start the higher ceiling. Favored? Start the safer floor. Pro shows both, side by side.
Unlock for today’s games
Free for a day · no card needed
Median (Standard) 0.8
Status Active
Median (Standard) 1.1
Status Active
Last 4 games
Recent form
- Spann-Ford: 1.4 Standard pts/game over his last 4, 39% of snaps, 1.3 touches, PHI allows the 20th most to TEs.
- McGowan: 3.3 Standard pts/game over his last 4, 28% of snaps, 7.3 touches, MIN allows the 30th most to RBs.
| Spann-Ford | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 6 | @ GB | 3.5 | 46% | 4 |
| Wk 5 | vs TB | 0.0 | 33% | – |
| Wk 4 | @ HOU | 0.0 | 40% | – |
| Wk 3 | vs BAL | 1.9 | 38% | 1 |
| McGowan | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | @ MIN | 4.8 | 33% | 12 |
| Wk 6 | vs TEN | 2.7 | 23% | 4 |
| Wk 5 | @ PIT | 1.9 | 27% | 6 |
| Wk 4 | @ WAS | 3.8 | 29% | 7 |
Week 7
Projected stat lines
| Stat | Spann-Ford | McGowan |
|---|---|---|
| Median Standard pts | 0.8 | 1.1 |
| Rec | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| Rec Yds | 11.0 | 4.1 |
| Rec TD | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Rush Yds | 0.0 | 11.6 |
| Rush TD | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Floor, ceiling, boom & bust