Report a problem
Week 7 · Half PPR start/sit
Start CeeDee Lamb or Chuba Hubbard?
The verdict
Start Chuba Hubbard
Wins 58% of simulated matchups against Lamb.
Hubbard already played: 8.0 Half PPR pts (projected 14.2).
Week 6: Hubbard outscored Lamb 18.6 to 11.5. Our call, start Hubbard (64%), was right.
Lamb 42% 58% Hubbard
Share of simulations in which each player scores more Half PPR pts. How accurate are these?
Median (Half PPR) 11.3
Status Active
Median (Half PPR) 14.2
Status Active
Last 4 games
Recent form
- Lamb: 15.7 Half PPR pts/game over his last 4, 78% of snaps, 9.0 touches, PHI allows the 2nd most to WRs.
- Hubbard: 16.3 Half PPR pts/game over his last 4, 81% of snaps, 21.0 touches, TB allows the 30th most to RBs.
| Lamb | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 6 | @ GB | 11.5 | 88% | 9 |
| Wk 5 | vs TB | 1.9 | 57% | 2 |
| Wk 4 | @ HOU | 32.8 | 86% | 18 |
| Wk 3 | vs BAL | 16.7 | 82% | 7 |
| Hubbard | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | vs TB | 8.0 | 61% | 11 |
| Wk 6 | @ PHI | 18.6 | 94% | 29 |
| Wk 4 | vs DET | 25.4 | 84% | 21 |
| Wk 3 | @ CLE | 13.0 | 84% | 23 |
Week 7
Projected stat lines
| Stat | Lamb | Hubbard |
|---|---|---|
| Median Half PPR pts | 11.3 | 14.2 |
| Rec | 6.6 | 2.3 |
| Rec Yds | 85.2 | 15.7 |
| Rec TD | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Rush Yds | 1.4 | 72.8 |
| Rush TD | 0.0 | 0.7 |
Floor, ceiling, boom & bust