Report a problem
Week 7 · PPR start/sit
Start CeeDee Lamb or Chuba Hubbard?
Close call
Start Chuba Hubbard
Wins 53% of simulated matchups against Lamb.
Hubbard already played: 10.0 PPR pts (projected 15.6).
Week 6: Hubbard outscored Lamb 19.1 to 16.0. Our call, start Hubbard (59%), was right.
Lamb 47% 53% Hubbard
Share of simulations in which each player scores more PPR pts. How accurate are these?
Free tiebreaker
Hubbard has the higher ceiling
By how much, and who’s safer?
Need a big week? Start the higher ceiling. Favored? Start the safer floor. Pro shows both, side by side.
Unlock for today’s games
Free for a day · no card needed
Median (PPR) 14.3
Status Active
Median (PPR) 15.6
Status Active
Last 4 games
Recent form
- Lamb: 20.1 PPR pts/game over his last 4, 78% of snaps, 9.0 touches, PHI allows the 3rd most to WRs.
- Hubbard: 17.5 PPR pts/game over his last 4, 87% of snaps, 21.0 touches, TB allows the 29th most to RBs.
| Lamb | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 6 | @ GB | 16.0 | 88% | 9 |
| Wk 5 | vs TB | 2.9 | 57% | 2 |
| Wk 4 | @ HOU | 41.3 | 86% | 18 |
| Wk 3 | vs BAL | 20.2 | 82% | 7 |
| Hubbard | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | vs TB | 10.0 | – | 11 |
| Wk 6 | @ PHI | 19.1 | 94% | 29 |
| Wk 4 | vs DET | 25.9 | 84% | 21 |
| Wk 3 | @ CLE | 15.0 | 84% | 23 |
Week 7
Projected stat lines
| Stat | Lamb | Hubbard |
|---|---|---|
| Median PPR pts | 14.3 | 15.6 |
| Rec | 6.6 | 2.3 |
| Rec Yds | 85.2 | 15.7 |
| Rec TD | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Rush Yds | 1.4 | 72.8 |
| Rush TD | 0.0 | 0.7 |
Floor, ceiling, boom & bust