Report a problem
Week 7 · PPR start/sit
Start CeeDee Lamb or Matthew Golden?
Close call
Start Matthew Golden
Wins 50% of simulated matchups against Lamb.
Golden already played: 9.9 PPR pts (projected 14.2).
Week 6: Golden outscored Lamb 22.4 to 16.0. Our call, start Lamb (53%), was wrong.
Lamb 50% 50% Golden
Share of simulations in which each player scores more PPR pts. How accurate are these?
Free tiebreaker
Golden has the higher ceiling
By how much, and who’s safer?
Need a big week? Start the higher ceiling. Favored? Start the safer floor. Pro shows both, side by side.
Unlock for today’s games
Free for a day · no card needed
Median (PPR) 14.3
Status Active
Median (PPR) 14.2
Status No game designation Limited practice Fri · 92% to play Report as of Mon 2:01 AM ET · checked 3m ago
Last 4 games
Recent form
- Lamb: 20.1 PPR pts/game over his last 4, 78% of snaps, 9.0 touches, PHI allows the 3rd most to WRs.
- Golden: 16.1 PPR pts/game over his last 4, 83% of snaps, 5.5 touches, DET allows the 2nd most to WRs.
| Lamb | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 6 | @ GB | 16.0 | 88% | 9 |
| Wk 5 | vs TB | 2.9 | 57% | 2 |
| Wk 4 | @ HOU | 41.3 | 86% | 18 |
| Wk 3 | vs BAL | 20.2 | 82% | 7 |
| Golden | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | @ DET | 9.9 | – | 6 |
| Wk 6 | vs DAL | 22.4 | 84% | 6 |
| Wk 5 | vs CHI | 20.3 | 77% | 6 |
| Wk 4 | @ TB | 11.7 | 88% | 4 |
Week 7
Projected stat lines
| Stat | Lamb | Golden |
|---|---|---|
| Median PPR pts | 14.3 | 14.2 |
| Rec | 6.6 | 4.7 |
| Rec Yds | 85.2 | 76.8 |
| Rec TD | 0.4 | 0.5 |
Floor, ceiling, boom & bust