Report a problem
Week 7 · PPR start/sit
Start CeeDee Lamb or Trey McBride?
Close call
Start CeeDee Lamb
Wins 51% of simulated matchups against McBride.
McBride already played: 27.1 PPR pts (projected 14.2).
Week 6: Lamb outscored McBride 16.0 to 12.3. Our call, start McBride (53%), was wrong.
Lamb 51% 49% McBride
Share of simulations in which each player scores more PPR pts. How accurate are these?
Free tiebreaker
Lamb has the higher ceiling
By how much, and who’s safer?
Need a big week? Start the higher ceiling. Favored? Start the safer floor. Pro shows both, side by side.
Unlock for today’s games
Free for a day · no card needed
Median (PPR) 14.3
Status Active
Median (PPR) 14.2
Status Active
Last 4 games
Recent form
- Lamb: 20.1 PPR pts/game over his last 4, 78% of snaps, 9.0 touches, PHI allows the 3rd most to WRs.
- McBride: 17.8 PPR pts/game over his last 4, 95% of snaps, 8.3 touches, DEN allows the 10th most to TEs.
| Lamb | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 6 | @ GB | 16.0 | 88% | 9 |
| Wk 5 | vs TB | 2.9 | 57% | 2 |
| Wk 4 | @ HOU | 41.3 | 86% | 18 |
| Wk 3 | vs BAL | 20.2 | 82% | 7 |
| McBride | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | vs DEN | 27.1 | – | 10 |
| Wk 6 | @ LAR | 12.3 | 97% | 7 |
| Wk 5 | vs DET | 21.6 | 90% | 9 |
| Wk 4 | @ NYG | 10.1 | 97% | 7 |
Week 7
Projected stat lines
| Stat | Lamb | McBride |
|---|---|---|
| Median PPR pts | 14.3 | 14.2 |
| Rec | 6.6 | 7.7 |
| Rec Yds | 85.2 | 64.8 |
| Rec TD | 0.4 | 0.5 |
Floor, ceiling, boom & bust