Report a problem
Week 7 · PPR start/sit
Start Konata Mumpfield or Kyle Pitts?
Final · Week 7
Pitts outscored Mumpfield
Our call was start Mumpfield (50%): wrong by 10.7 PPR pts.
Mumpfield 2.5 Projected 7.6
Pitts 13.2 Projected 7.7
Median (PPR) 7.6
Status Active
Median (PPR) 7.7
Status Active
Last 4 games
Recent form
- Mumpfield: 1.9 PPR pts/game over his last 4, 31% of snaps, 1.0 touches, LV allows the 16th most to WRs.
- Pitts: 14.8 PPR pts/game over his last 4, 63% of snaps, 4.5 touches, SF allows the 21st most to TEs.
| Mumpfield | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | @ LV | 2.5 | 43% | 1 |
| Wk 6 | vs ARI | 3.5 | 47% | 2 |
| Wk 5 | vs BUF | 0.0 | 7% | – |
| Wk 4 | @ PHI | 1.7 | 27% | 1 |
| Pitts | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | vs SF | 13.2 | 56% | 5 |
| Wk 6 | vs CHI | 23.0 | 78% | 5 |
| Wk 5 | vs BAL | 15.2 | 67% | 5 |
| Wk 4 | @ NO | 7.7 | 51% | 3 |
Week 7
Projected stat lines
| Stat | Mumpfield | Pitts |
|---|---|---|
| Median PPR pts | 7.6 | 7.7 |
| Rec | 3.7 | 3.3 |
| Rec Yds | 53.7 | 36.8 |
| Rec TD | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Floor, ceiling, boom & bust