Report a problem
Week 7 · Standard start/sit
Start Konata Mumpfield or Kyle Pitts?
Final · Week 7
Pitts outscored Mumpfield
Our call was start Mumpfield (52%): wrong by 6.7 Standard pts.
Mumpfield 1.5 Projected 4.8
Pitts 8.2 Projected 4.1
Median (Standard) 4.8
Status Active
Median (Standard) 4.1
Status Active
Last 4 games
Recent form
- Mumpfield: 0.9 Standard pts/game over his last 4, 31% of snaps, 1.0 touches, LV allows the 10th most to WRs.
- Pitts: 10.3 Standard pts/game over his last 4, 63% of snaps, 4.5 touches, SF allows the 26th most to TEs.
| Mumpfield | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | @ LV | 1.5 | 43% | 1 |
| Wk 6 | vs ARI | 1.5 | 47% | 2 |
| Wk 5 | vs BUF | 0.0 | 7% | – |
| Wk 4 | @ PHI | 0.7 | 27% | 1 |
| Pitts | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | vs SF | 8.2 | 56% | 5 |
| Wk 6 | vs CHI | 18.0 | 78% | 5 |
| Wk 5 | vs BAL | 10.2 | 67% | 5 |
| Wk 4 | @ NO | 4.7 | 51% | 3 |
Week 7
Projected stat lines
| Stat | Mumpfield | Pitts |
|---|---|---|
| Median Standard pts | 4.8 | 4.1 |
| Rec | 3.7 | 3.3 |
| Rec Yds | 53.7 | 36.8 |
| Rec TD | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Floor, ceiling, boom & bust