Report a problem
Week 7 · Standard start/sit
Start Konata Mumpfield or Ryan Flournoy?
Close call
Start Konata Mumpfield
Wins 52% of simulated matchups against Flournoy.
Mumpfield already played: 1.5 Standard pts (projected 4.8).
Week 6: Flournoy outscored Mumpfield 10.0 to 1.5. Our call, start Flournoy (69%), was right.
Mumpfield 52% 48% Flournoy
Share of simulations in which each player scores more Standard pts. How accurate are these?
Free tiebreaker
Mumpfield has the higher ceiling
By how much, and who’s safer?
Need a big week? Start the higher ceiling. Favored? Start the safer floor. Pro shows both, side by side.
Unlock for today’s games
Free for a day · no card needed
Median (Standard) 4.8
Status Active
Median (Standard) 4.3
Status Active
Last 4 games
Recent form
- Mumpfield: 0.9 Standard pts/game over his last 4, 31% of snaps, 1.0 touches, LV allows the 10th most to WRs.
- Flournoy: 6.2 Standard pts/game over his last 4, 74% of snaps, 4.0 touches, PHI allows the 2nd most to WRs.
| Mumpfield | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | @ LV | 1.5 | 43% | 1 |
| Wk 6 | vs ARI | 1.5 | 47% | 2 |
| Wk 5 | vs BUF | 0.0 | 7% | – |
| Wk 4 | @ PHI | 0.7 | 27% | 1 |
| Flournoy | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 6 | @ GB | 10.0 | 87% | 7 |
| Wk 5 | vs TB | 9.0 | 68% | 3 |
| Wk 4 | @ HOU | 3.7 | 74% | 4 |
| Wk 3 | vs BAL | 2.2 | 66% | 2 |
Week 7
Projected stat lines
| Stat | Mumpfield | Flournoy |
|---|---|---|
| Median Standard pts | 4.8 | 4.3 |
| Rec | 3.7 | 3.6 |
| Rec Yds | 53.7 | 40.4 |
| Rec TD | 0.3 | 0.2 |
Floor, ceiling, boom & bust