Report a problem
Week 7 · PPR start/sit
Start Brevyn Spann-Ford or Cole Kmet?
Close call
Start Cole Kmet
Wins 52% of simulated matchups against Spann-Ford.
Kmet already played: 5.8 PPR pts (projected 2.3).
Week 6: Spann-Ford outscored Kmet 7.5 to 2.3. Our call, start Kmet (59%), was wrong.
Spann-Ford 48% 52% Kmet
Share of simulations in which each player scores more PPR pts. How accurate are these?
Free tiebreaker
Kmet has the higher ceiling
By how much, and who’s safer?
Need a big week? Start the higher ceiling. Favored? Start the safer floor. Pro shows both, side by side.
Unlock for today’s games
Free for a day · no card needed
Median (PPR) 2.1
Status Active
Median (PPR) 2.3
Status Active
Last 4 games
Recent form
- Spann-Ford: 2.6 PPR pts/game over his last 4, 39% of snaps, 1.3 touches, PHI allows the 23rd most to TEs.
- Kmet: 3.3 PPR pts/game over his last 4, 61% of snaps, 2.0 touches, NE allows the 18th most to TEs.
| Spann-Ford | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 6 | @ GB | 7.5 | 46% | 4 |
| Wk 5 | vs TB | 0.0 | 33% | – |
| Wk 4 | @ HOU | 0.0 | 40% | – |
| Wk 3 | vs BAL | 2.9 | 38% | 1 |
| Kmet | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | vs NE | 5.8 | 55% | 3 |
| Wk 6 | @ ATL | 2.3 | 74% | 2 |
| Wk 5 | @ GB | 1.8 | 42% | 1 |
| Wk 4 | vs NYJ | 3.3 | 73% | 2 |
Week 7
Projected stat lines
| Stat | Spann-Ford | Kmet |
|---|---|---|
| Median PPR pts | 2.1 | 2.3 |
| Rec | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Rec Yds | 11.0 | 13.6 |
| Rec TD | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Floor, ceiling, boom & bust