Report a problem
Week 7 · Standard start/sit
Start Brevyn Spann-Ford or Cole Kmet?
Close call
Start Cole Kmet
Wins 54% of simulated matchups against Spann-Ford.
Kmet already played: 2.8 Standard pts (projected 0.9).
Week 6: Spann-Ford outscored Kmet 3.5 to 0.3. Our call, start Kmet (58%), was wrong.
Spann-Ford 46% 54% Kmet
Share of simulations in which each player scores more Standard pts. How accurate are these?
Free tiebreaker
Kmet has the higher ceiling
By how much, and who’s safer?
Need a big week? Start the higher ceiling. Favored? Start the safer floor. Pro shows both, side by side.
Unlock for today’s games
Free for a day · no card needed
Median (Standard) 0.8
Status Active
Median (Standard) 0.9
Status Active
Last 4 games
Recent form
- Spann-Ford: 1.4 Standard pts/game over his last 4, 39% of snaps, 1.3 touches, PHI allows the 20th most to TEs.
- Kmet: 1.3 Standard pts/game over his last 4, 61% of snaps, 2.0 touches, NE allows the 21st most to TEs.
| Spann-Ford | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 6 | @ GB | 3.5 | 46% | 4 |
| Wk 5 | vs TB | 0.0 | 33% | – |
| Wk 4 | @ HOU | 0.0 | 40% | – |
| Wk 3 | vs BAL | 1.9 | 38% | 1 |
| Kmet | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | vs NE | 2.8 | 55% | 3 |
| Wk 6 | @ ATL | 0.3 | 74% | 2 |
| Wk 5 | @ GB | 0.8 | 42% | 1 |
| Wk 4 | vs NYJ | 1.3 | 73% | 2 |
Week 7
Projected stat lines
| Stat | Spann-Ford | Kmet |
|---|---|---|
| Median Standard pts | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| Rec | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Rec Yds | 10.9 | 13.6 |
| Rec TD | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Floor, ceiling, boom & bust