Report a problem
Week 7 · PPR start/sit
Start Brock Bowers or CeeDee Lamb?
Close call
Start CeeDee Lamb
Wins 51% of simulated matchups against Bowers.
Bowers already played: 13.3 PPR pts (projected 13.8).
Week 6: Lamb outscored Bowers 16.0 to 11.0. Our call, start Bowers (54%), was wrong.
Bowers 49% 51% Lamb
Share of simulations in which each player scores more PPR pts. How accurate are these?
Free tiebreaker
Bowers has the higher ceiling
By how much, and who’s safer?
Need a big week? Start the higher ceiling. Favored? Start the safer floor. Pro shows both, side by side.
Unlock for today’s games
Free for a day · no card needed
Median (PPR) 13.8
Status Active
Median (PPR) 14.3
Status Active
Last 4 games
Recent form
- Bowers: 17.0 PPR pts/game over his last 4, 83% of snaps, 6.0 touches, LAR allows the 28th most to TEs.
- Lamb: 20.1 PPR pts/game over his last 4, 78% of snaps, 9.0 touches, PHI allows the 3rd most to WRs.
| Bowers | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | vs LAR | 13.3 | – | 6 |
| Wk 6 | vs BUF | 11.0 | 98% | 4 |
| Wk 5 | @ NE | 23.0 | 70% | 8 |
| Wk 4 | vs KC | 20.6 | 82% | 6 |
| Lamb | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 6 | @ GB | 16.0 | 88% | 9 |
| Wk 5 | vs TB | 2.9 | 57% | 2 |
| Wk 4 | @ HOU | 41.3 | 86% | 18 |
| Wk 3 | vs BAL | 20.2 | 82% | 7 |
Week 7
Projected stat lines
| Stat | Bowers | Lamb |
|---|---|---|
| Median PPR pts | 13.8 | 14.3 |
| Rec | 5.7 | 6.6 |
| Rec Yds | 65.2 | 85.2 |
| Rec TD | 0.6 | 0.4 |
Floor, ceiling, boom & bust