Report a problem
Week 7 · DraftKings start/sit
Start CeeDee Lamb or DK Metcalf?
Close call
Start CeeDee Lamb
Wins 53% of simulated matchups against Metcalf.
Metcalf already played: 7.6 DraftKings pts (projected 13.4).
Week 6: Metcalf outscored Lamb 20.3 to 16.0. Our call, start Lamb (65%), was wrong.
Lamb 53% 47% Metcalf
Share of simulations in which each player scores more DraftKings pts. How accurate are these?
Free tiebreaker
Lamb has the higher ceiling
By how much, and who’s safer?
Need a big week? Start the higher ceiling. Favored? Start the safer floor. Pro shows both, side by side.
Unlock for today’s games
Free for a day · no card needed
Median (DraftKings) 14.4
Status Active
Median (DraftKings) 13.4
Status Active
Last 4 games
Recent form
- Lamb: 21.6 DraftKings pts/game over his last 4, 78% of snaps, 9.0 touches, PHI allows the 4th most to WRs.
- Metcalf: 13.2 DraftKings pts/game over his last 4, 94% of snaps, 5.5 touches, NO allows the 23rd most to WRs.
| Lamb | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 6 | @ GB | 16.0 | 88% | 9 |
| Wk 5 | vs TB | 2.9 | 57% | 2 |
| Wk 4 | @ HOU | 44.3 | 86% | 18 |
| Wk 3 | vs BAL | 23.2 | 82% | 7 |
| Metcalf | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | @ NO | 7.6 | 92% | 2 |
| Wk 6 | @ TB | 20.3 | 95% | 11 |
| Wk 5 | vs IND | 5.3 | 92% | 4 |
| Wk 4 | @ CLE | 19.5 | 97% | 5 |
Week 7
Projected stat lines
| Stat | Lamb | Metcalf |
|---|---|---|
| Median DraftKings pts | 14.4 | 13.4 |
| Rec | 6.6 | 5.4 |
| Rec Yds | 85.2 | 70.8 |
| Rec TD | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Floor, ceiling, boom & bust