Report a problem
Week 7 · Half PPR start/sit
Start CeeDee Lamb or DK Metcalf?
Close call
Start CeeDee Lamb
Wins 52% of simulated matchups against Metcalf.
Metcalf already played: 6.6 Half PPR pts (projected 10.7).
Week 6: Metcalf outscored Lamb 14.8 to 11.5. Our call, start Lamb (65%), was wrong.
Lamb 52% 48% Metcalf
Share of simulations in which each player scores more Half PPR pts. How accurate are these?
Free tiebreaker
Lamb has the higher ceiling
By how much, and who’s safer?
Need a big week? Start the higher ceiling. Favored? Start the safer floor. Pro shows both, side by side.
Unlock for today’s games
Free for a day · no card needed
Median (Half PPR) 11.3
Status Active
Median (Half PPR) 10.7
Status Active
Last 4 games
Recent form
- Lamb: 15.7 Half PPR pts/game over his last 4, 78% of snaps, 9.0 touches, PHI allows the 2nd most to WRs.
- Metcalf: 9.8 Half PPR pts/game over his last 4, 94% of snaps, 5.5 touches, NO allows the 21st most to WRs.
| Lamb | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 6 | @ GB | 11.5 | 88% | 9 |
| Wk 5 | vs TB | 1.9 | 57% | 2 |
| Wk 4 | @ HOU | 32.8 | 86% | 18 |
| Wk 3 | vs BAL | 16.7 | 82% | 7 |
| Metcalf | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | @ NO | 6.6 | 92% | 2 |
| Wk 6 | @ TB | 14.8 | 95% | 11 |
| Wk 5 | vs IND | 3.8 | 92% | 4 |
| Wk 4 | @ CLE | 14.0 | 97% | 5 |
Week 7
Projected stat lines
| Stat | Lamb | Metcalf |
|---|---|---|
| Median Half PPR pts | 11.3 | 10.7 |
| Rec | 6.6 | 5.4 |
| Rec Yds | 85.2 | 70.8 |
| Rec TD | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Floor, ceiling, boom & bust