Report a problem
Week 7 · Half PPR start/sit
Start Kyle Pitts or Ryan Flournoy?
Close call
Start Ryan Flournoy
Wins 51% of simulated matchups against Pitts.
Pitts already played: 10.7 Half PPR pts (projected 5.9).
Week 6: Pitts outscored Flournoy 20.5 to 13.5. Our call, start Flournoy (52%), was wrong.
Pitts 49% 51% Flournoy
Share of simulations in which each player scores more Half PPR pts. How accurate are these?
Free tiebreaker
Pitts has the safer floor
By how much, and who has the upside?
Need a big week? Start the higher ceiling. Favored? Start the safer floor. Pro shows both, side by side.
Unlock for today’s games
Free for a day · no card needed
Median (Half PPR) 5.9
Status Active
Median (Half PPR) 6.3
Status Active
Last 4 games
Recent form
- Pitts: 12.5 Half PPR pts/game over his last 4, 63% of snaps, 4.5 touches, SF allows the 24th most to TEs.
- Flournoy: 8.2 Half PPR pts/game over his last 4, 74% of snaps, 4.0 touches, PHI allows the 2nd most to WRs.
| Pitts | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | vs SF | 10.7 | 56% | 5 |
| Wk 6 | vs CHI | 20.5 | 78% | 5 |
| Wk 5 | vs BAL | 12.7 | 67% | 5 |
| Wk 4 | @ NO | 6.2 | 51% | 3 |
| Flournoy | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 6 | @ GB | 13.5 | 87% | 7 |
| Wk 5 | vs TB | 10.5 | 68% | 3 |
| Wk 4 | @ HOU | 5.7 | 74% | 4 |
| Wk 3 | vs BAL | 3.2 | 66% | 2 |
Week 7
Projected stat lines
| Stat | Pitts | Flournoy |
|---|---|---|
| Median Half PPR pts | 5.9 | 6.3 |
| Rec | 3.3 | 3.6 |
| Rec Yds | 36.8 | 40.4 |
| Rec TD | 0.3 | 0.2 |
Floor, ceiling, boom & bust