Report a problem
Week 7 · PPR start/sit
Start Kyle Pitts or Ryan Flournoy?
Close call
Start Ryan Flournoy
Wins 52% of simulated matchups against Pitts.
Pitts already played: 13.2 PPR pts (projected 7.7).
Week 6: Pitts outscored Flournoy 23.0 to 17.0. Our call, start Flournoy (53%), was wrong.
Pitts 48% 52% Flournoy
Share of simulations in which each player scores more PPR pts. How accurate are these?
Free tiebreaker
Pitts has the safer floor
By how much, and who has the upside?
Need a big week? Start the higher ceiling. Favored? Start the safer floor. Pro shows both, side by side.
Unlock for today’s games
Free for a day · no card needed
Median (PPR) 7.7
Status Active
Median (PPR) 8.2
Status Active
Last 4 games
Recent form
- Pitts: 14.8 PPR pts/game over his last 4, 65% of snaps, 4.5 touches, SF allows the 21st most to TEs.
- Flournoy: 10.2 PPR pts/game over his last 4, 74% of snaps, 4.0 touches, PHI allows the 3rd most to WRs.
| Pitts | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 7 | vs SF | 13.2 | – | 5 |
| Wk 6 | vs CHI | 23.0 | 78% | 5 |
| Wk 5 | vs BAL | 15.2 | 67% | 5 |
| Wk 4 | @ NO | 7.7 | 51% | 3 |
| Flournoy | Opp | Pts | Snaps | Touches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 6 | @ GB | 17.0 | 87% | 7 |
| Wk 5 | vs TB | 12.0 | 68% | 3 |
| Wk 4 | @ HOU | 7.7 | 74% | 4 |
| Wk 3 | vs BAL | 4.2 | 66% | 2 |
Week 7
Projected stat lines
| Stat | Pitts | Flournoy |
|---|---|---|
| Median PPR pts | 7.7 | 8.2 |
| Rec | 3.3 | 3.6 |
| Rec Yds | 36.8 | 40.4 |
| Rec TD | 0.3 | 0.2 |
Floor, ceiling, boom & bust